Difference between revisions of "HAEM5:Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma"
[pending revision] | [pending revision] |
Fnu.Monika (talk | contribs) |
Bailey.Glen (talk | contribs) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma}} | ||
− | [[HAEM5:Table_of_Contents|Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.)]] | + | [[HAEM5:Table_of_Contents|Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)]] |
{{Under Construction}} | {{Under Construction}} | ||
− | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title= | + | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=Content Update To WHO 5th Edition Classification Is In Process; Content Below is Based on WHO 4th Edition Classification|This page was converted to the new template on 2023-12-07. The original page can be found at [[HAEM4:Enteropathy-Associated T-cell Lymphoma]]. |
}}</blockquote> | }}</blockquote> | ||
− | <span style="color:#0070C0">(General Instructions – The main focus of these pages is the clinically significant genetic alterations in each disease type. Use [https://www.genenames.org/ <u>HUGO-approved gene names and symbols</u>] (italicized when appropriate), [https://varnomen.hgvs.org/ HGVS-based nomenclature for variants], as well as generic names of drugs and testing platforms or assays if applicable. Please complete tables whenever possible and do not delete them (add N/A if not applicable in the table and delete the examples). Please do not delete or alter the section headings. The use of bullet points alongside short blocks of text rather than only large paragraphs is encouraged. Additional instructions below in italicized blue text should not be included in the final page content. Please also see </span><u>[[Author_Instructions]]</u><span style="color:#0070C0"> and [[Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)|<u>FAQs</u>]] as well as contact your [[Leadership|<u>Associate Editor</u>]] or [mailto:CCGA@cancergenomics.org <u>Technical Support</u>])</span> | + | <span style="color:#0070C0">(General Instructions – The main focus of these pages is the clinically significant genetic alterations in each disease type. Use [https://www.genenames.org/ <u>HUGO-approved gene names and symbols</u>] (italicized when appropriate), [https://varnomen.hgvs.org/ HGVS-based nomenclature for variants], as well as generic names of drugs and testing platforms or assays if applicable. Please complete tables whenever possible and do not delete them (add N/A if not applicable in the table and delete the examples); to add (or move) a row or column to a table, click within the table and select the > symbol that appears to be given options. Please do not delete or alter the section headings. The use of bullet points alongside short blocks of text rather than only large paragraphs is encouraged. Additional instructions below in italicized blue text should not be included in the final page content. Please also see </span><u>[[Author_Instructions]]</u><span style="color:#0070C0"> and [[Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)|<u>FAQs</u>]] as well as contact your [[Leadership|<u>Associate Editor</u>]] or [mailto:CCGA@cancergenomics.org <u>Technical Support</u>])</span> |
==Primary Author(s)*== | ==Primary Author(s)*== | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
− | == | + | ==WHO Classification of Disease== |
− | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
− | + | !Structure | |
− | + | !Disease | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |Book | |
+ | |Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Category | ||
+ | |T-cell and NK-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Family | ||
+ | |Mature T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Type | ||
+ | |Intestinal T-cell and NK-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Subtype(s) | ||
+ | |Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma | ||
+ | |} | ||
==Definition / Description of Disease== | ==Definition / Description of Disease== | ||
− | + | *'''Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is an aggressive intestinal T-cell lymphoma more common in patients with celiac disease, especially type II refractory celiac disease (RCDII).''' | |
− | *'''Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is an aggressive intestinal T-cell lymphoma more common in patients with celiac disease'''<ref name=":5">Govind Bhagat, et al. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024 [cited 2024 July 2]. (WHO classification of tumors series, 5th ed.; vol. 11). Available from: <nowiki>https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chaptercontent/63/224</nowiki> </ref> | + | *'''Most of the EATL cases develop through an intermediate step of RCDII, however it can also arise de novo in patients with celiac disease. <u>33579790</u>''' |
+ | *'''RCDII can be defined as failure to respond to a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months and is associated with clonal expansion of immunophenotypically an aberrant IELs''' <ref name=":5">Govind Bhagat, et al. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024 [cited 2024 July 2]. (WHO classification of tumors series, 5th ed.; vol. 11). Available from: <nowiki>https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chaptercontent/63/224</nowiki> </ref>, { 33707055 }. | ||
*Celiac disease may be diagnosed prior to EATL diagnosis in 20-73% of cases, or both entities may be diagnosed concomitantly in 10-58% of the cases<ref name=":5" /> | *Celiac disease may be diagnosed prior to EATL diagnosis in 20-73% of cases, or both entities may be diagnosed concomitantly in 10-58% of the cases<ref name=":5" /> | ||
*Risk factors include homozygosity for HLA-DQ2 and advanced age<ref name=":5" /> | *Risk factors include homozygosity for HLA-DQ2 and advanced age<ref name=":5" /> | ||
Line 38: | Line 53: | ||
*0.5-1 in 1 million general population (2-5% in patients with celiac disease, 60-80% in patients with refractory celiac disease type 2)<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=Wh|first=Verbeek|last2=Jm|first2=Van De Water|last3=A|first3=Al-Toma|last4=Jj|first4=Oudejans|last5=Cj|first5=Mulder|last6=Vm|first6=Coupé|date=2008|title=Incidence of enteropathy--associated T-cell lymphoma: a nation-wide study of a population-based registry in The Netherlands|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18618372/|language=en|pmid=18618372}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Aj|first=Ferreri|last2=Pl|first2=Zinzani|last3=S|first3=Govi|last4=Sa|first4=Pileri|date=2011|title=Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20655757/|language=en|pmid=20655757}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=J|first=Delabie|last2=H|first2=Holte|last3=Jm|first3=Vose|last4=F|first4=Ullrich|last5=Es|first5=Jaffe|last6=Kj|first6=Savage|last7=Jm|first7=Connors|last8=L|first8=Rimsza|last9=Nl|first9=Harris|date=2011|title=Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: clinical and histological findings from the international peripheral T-cell lymphoma project|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21566094/|language=en|pmid=21566094}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=A|first=Rubio-Tapia|last2=Ja|first2=Murray|date=2010|title=Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20332526/|language=en|doi=10.1136/gut.2009.195131|pmc=PMC2861306|pmid=20332526}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=G|first=Malamut|last2=P|first2=Afchain|last3=V|first3=Verkarre|last4=T|first4=Lecomte|last5=A|first5=Amiot|last6=D|first6=Damotte|last7=Y|first7=Bouhnik|last8=Jf|first8=Colombel|last9=Jc|first9=Delchier|date=2009|title=Presentation and long-term follow-up of refractory celiac disease: comparison of type I with type II|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19014942/|language=en|pmid=19014942}}</ref> | *0.5-1 in 1 million general population (2-5% in patients with celiac disease, 60-80% in patients with refractory celiac disease type 2)<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=Wh|first=Verbeek|last2=Jm|first2=Van De Water|last3=A|first3=Al-Toma|last4=Jj|first4=Oudejans|last5=Cj|first5=Mulder|last6=Vm|first6=Coupé|date=2008|title=Incidence of enteropathy--associated T-cell lymphoma: a nation-wide study of a population-based registry in The Netherlands|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18618372/|language=en|pmid=18618372}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Aj|first=Ferreri|last2=Pl|first2=Zinzani|last3=S|first3=Govi|last4=Sa|first4=Pileri|date=2011|title=Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20655757/|language=en|pmid=20655757}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=J|first=Delabie|last2=H|first2=Holte|last3=Jm|first3=Vose|last4=F|first4=Ullrich|last5=Es|first5=Jaffe|last6=Kj|first6=Savage|last7=Jm|first7=Connors|last8=L|first8=Rimsza|last9=Nl|first9=Harris|date=2011|title=Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: clinical and histological findings from the international peripheral T-cell lymphoma project|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21566094/|language=en|pmid=21566094}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=A|first=Rubio-Tapia|last2=Ja|first2=Murray|date=2010|title=Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20332526/|language=en|doi=10.1136/gut.2009.195131|pmc=PMC2861306|pmid=20332526}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=G|first=Malamut|last2=P|first2=Afchain|last3=V|first3=Verkarre|last4=T|first4=Lecomte|last5=A|first5=Amiot|last6=D|first6=Damotte|last7=Y|first7=Bouhnik|last8=Jf|first8=Colombel|last9=Jc|first9=Delchier|date=2009|title=Presentation and long-term follow-up of refractory celiac disease: comparison of type I with type II|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19014942/|language=en|pmid=19014942}}</ref> | ||
− | *'''More common in regions with a high | + | *'''EATL accounts for 3% of peripheral T-cell lymphomas and represents 66% of all primary intestinal T-cell lymphomas'''<ref name=":5" /> |
+ | *'''More common in regions with a high prevalence of CD, particularly Europe (0.05–0.14 cases per 100 000 population) { 15825131 ; 20197551 ; 18618372 } and the USA (0.016 cases per 100 000 population)''' | ||
+ | *'''Extremely rare in Asia due to low population frequency of celiac HLA risk alleles<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />''' | ||
*> 60% of all cases in intestinal T- cell lymphomas<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> | *> 60% of all cases in intestinal T- cell lymphomas<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> | ||
− | *M:F 1.04:1 to 2.8:1<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> | + | *'''M:F 1.04:1 to 2.8:1'''<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> |
− | *6th-7th decade of life<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> | + | *'''6th-7th decade of life'''<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> |
*Mostly Caucasian (> 90%)<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> | *Mostly Caucasian (> 90%)<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> | ||
− | |||
==Clinical Features== | ==Clinical Features== | ||
− | + | Many of the below features are indistinguishable from the presentation of celiac disease, which may delay the diagnosis of EATL. Persistent symptoms following gluten-free diet is highly suggestive of EATL.<ref name=":1" /> | |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|'''Signs and Symptoms''' | |'''Signs and Symptoms''' | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*Abdominal pain | *Abdominal pain | ||
*Weight loss | *Weight loss | ||
*Gluten-insensitive diarrhea/malabsorption | *Gluten-insensitive diarrhea/malabsorption | ||
− | *Bowel obstruction or perforation | + | *Bowel obstruction or perforation (50% cases) |
− | + | |- | |
− | '''Laboratory Findings''' | + | |'''Laboratory Findings''' |
− | + | | | |
*Anemia | *Anemia | ||
*Hypoalbuminemia | *Hypoalbuminemia | ||
*Hemophagocytosis | *Hemophagocytosis | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | *'''CD can be diagnosed at the time of EATL diagnosis'''<ref name=":5" /> | ||
+ | *'''Patients with RCD can sometimes present with small-intestinal ulceration (ulcerative jejunitis) { 9250161 ; 10381521 }.''' | ||
− | If there is no prior diagnosis of celiac disease and lymphoma is the initial presentation, the following findings can point towards celiac disease associated EATL: | + | If there is no prior diagnosis of celiac disease and lymphoma is the initial presentation, the following findings can point towards celiac disease associated EATL: |
*Anti-tissue transglutaminase-2 antibodies or Anti-endomysial antibodies | *Anti-tissue transglutaminase-2 antibodies or Anti-endomysial antibodies | ||
*Dermatitis herpetiformis | *Dermatitis herpetiformis | ||
− | |||
==Sites of Involvement== | ==Sites of Involvement== | ||
− | *Small intestine (predominantly jejunum and ileum > large intestine and stomach)<ref name=":1" /> | + | *'''Small intestine (predominantly jejunum and ileum > large intestine and stomach)<ref name=":1" />''' |
− | * | + | *'''Dissemination to extra gastrointestinal sites: mesenteric and abdominal lymph nodes > bone marrow, lung, liver or skin { 8583077 ; 23313469 ; 21566094 }.''' |
+ | *Metastases involve intra-abdominal node > bone marrow > lung > liver > skin<ref name=":1" /> | ||
*CNS (rare)<ref name=":1" /> | *CNS (rare)<ref name=":1" /> | ||
==Morphologic Features== | ==Morphologic Features== | ||
− | *Pleomorphic medium to large neoplastic lymphoid | + | *'''Pleomorphic medium to large sized neoplastic lymphoid cells with immunoblastic or anaplastic morphology.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":5" />''' |
+ | *'''Angulated vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and a pale-staining cytoplasm [https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162629<nowiki>]</nowiki>''' | ||
+ | *'''Extensive inflammatory background of histiocytes, eosinophils, small lymphocytes, and plasma cells <ref name=":5" />''' | ||
+ | *'''Adjacent mucosa often displays the histological features of active CD, including increased IEL infiltration, crypt hyperplasia, and villous atrophy <ref name=":2" /><ref name=":5" /> [https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162629<nowiki>]</nowiki>''' | ||
+ | *'''Angioinvasion and angiodestruction are commonly seen''' <ref name=":5" /> | ||
+ | * | ||
+ | * | ||
*Neighborhood mucosa characterized by villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia (non-malignant areas of celiac disease)<ref name=":2" /> | *Neighborhood mucosa characterized by villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia (non-malignant areas of celiac disease)<ref name=":2" /> | ||
*Round or angulated vesicular nuclei<ref name=":2" /> | *Round or angulated vesicular nuclei<ref name=":2" /> | ||
Line 103: | Line 110: | ||
*Angiocentric and angioinvasive features with extensive necrosis<ref name=":2" /> | *Angiocentric and angioinvasive features with extensive necrosis<ref name=":2" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
==Immunophenotype== | ==Immunophenotype== | ||
− | + | * '''The most common immunophenotypic profile in EATL is given below:''' | |
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
Line 111: | Line 119: | ||
!Finding!!Marker | !Finding!!Marker | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Positive (universal)|| | + | |Positive (universal)||CD3, CD7 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Positive ( | + | |Positive (frequent)||CD30 (harbinger of transformation to EATL from RCD2), NKP46 (not seen in IEL of CD or RCD1), CD103, |
+ | cytotoxic granule-associated markers (TIA1, granzyme B, perforin) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Negative ( | + | |Negative (frequent)||CD4, CD8, CD5, CD56, TCR, EBER |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Ki-67||high |
|} | |} | ||
+ | * '''Approximately 25% of EATLs (primarily de novo EATL) are CD8+, and rare cases express TCRγδ [23313469, 26462278]''' | ||
+ | * '''Ki-67 is very low and CD30 is negative in RCDII, their appearance is useful to monitor RCDII progression to EATL and to indicate the need for chemotherapeutic regimens targeting dividing cells, a therapeutic option that is inefficient and even dangerous in RCDII. <u>33579790</u>''' | ||
− | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
− | + | |+ | |
− | + | ! | |
+ | !RCD Type 1 | ||
+ | !RCD Type 2 | ||
+ | !EATL | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | + | |'''Histopathology''' | |
+ | |Identical to uncomplicated CD | ||
+ | |Moderate/ severe villous atrophy with atypical IELs | ||
+ | |Infiltration of medium to large sized pleomorphic IELs | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''IEL Immunophenotype''' |
+ | |Like CD; sCD3+, CD8+ | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | Immunophenotype of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL):<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last=P|first=Domizio|last2=Ra|first2=Owen|last3=Na|first3=Shepherd|last4=Ic|first4=Talbot|last5=Aj|first5=Norton|date=1993|title=Primary lymphoma of the small intestine. A clinicopathological study of 119 cases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8470758/|language=en|pmid=8470758}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Deleeuw|first=Ronald J.|last2=Zettl|first2=Andreas|last3=Klinker|first3=Erdwine|last4=Haralambieva|first4=Eugenia|last5=Trottier|first5=Magan|last6=Chari|first6=Raj|last7=Ge|first7=Yong|last8=Gascoyne|first8=Randy D.|last9=Chott|first9=Andreas|date=2007-05|title=Whole-genome analysis and HLA genotyping of enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma reveals 2 distinct lymphoma subtypes|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17484883|journal=Gastroenterology|volume=132|issue=5|pages=1902–1911|doi=10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.036|issn=0016-5085|pmid=17484883}}</ref> | ||
− | + | *Varies depending on background type 1 or type 2 refractory celiac disease (RCD). | |
− | + | **Type 1 (RCD1): | |
− | + | ***Milder symptoms with high 5-year survival with low risk of EATL development | |
− | + | ***Flow cytometry: sCD3+, CD8+, CD5+ | |
− | + | **Type 2 (RCD2): | |
− | + | ***Severe symptoms with protein-losing enteropathy leads to malnourishment (BMI < 18); low 5-year survival with increased risk of EATL | |
− | + | ***Flow cytometry: sCD3<sup>_</sup>, CD8-, CD5- | |
− | + | ***IHC: | |
− | + | ****NKP46: significantly more positive in RCD2 IEL than normal IEL in CD and RCD1; not specific for RCD2 or EATL, can be seen in [[HAEM5:Monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma|MEITL]]; not seen in [[HAEM5:Indolent T-cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract|indolent T-cell LPD of GI tract]] | |
− | + | ****CD30+ indicates progression to EATL | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)== | ==Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)== | ||
− | + | No recurrent gene fusions have been reported.<blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Clinical Significance (Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications).|Please incorporate this section into the relevant tables found in: | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Clinical Significance (Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications).|Please incorporate this section into the relevant tables found in: | ||
* Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions) | * Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions) | ||
* Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH | * Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH | ||
Line 205: | Line 191: | ||
==Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH== | ==Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH== | ||
− | Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene fusions. Can include references in the table. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable.'') </span> | + | Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene fusions. Can include references in the table. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable. Do not delete table.'') </span> |
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
Line 215: | Line 201: | ||
!Notes | !Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |9 |
− | + | |gain | |
− | + | |9q | |
− | | | + | |q22-34 |
− | | | + | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | | | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | |||
− | |EXAMPLE | ||
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference). | Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference). | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |16 |
− | + | |loss | |
− | + | |16q | |
− | | | + | |12.1 |
− | | | + | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | |EXAMPLE | ||
Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference). | Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference). | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |1 | ||
+ | |gain | ||
+ | |1q | ||
+ | |q22-44 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |5 | ||
+ | |gain | ||
+ | |5q | ||
+ | |q33.3–34 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |9 | ||
+ | |LOH | ||
+ | |9p | ||
+ | |p21 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |7 | ||
+ | |gain | ||
+ | |7q | ||
+ | |q11.21-q36.1 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |8 | ||
+ | |loss | ||
+ | |8p | ||
+ | |p23.3-p11.21 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |8 | ||
+ | |gain | ||
+ | |8q | ||
+ | |q24 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |13 | ||
+ | |loss | ||
+ | |13q | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |17 | ||
+ | |loss | ||
+ | |17p | ||
+ | |p12-13.2 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 321: | Line 367: | ||
==Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns== | ==Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns== | ||
− | Put your text here <span style="color:#0070C0">(''EXAMPLE PATTERNS: hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis'')</span> | + | Put your text here <span style="color:#0070C0">(''EXAMPLE PATTERNS: hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis. Do not delete table.'')</span> |
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
Line 331: | Line 377: | ||
!Notes | !Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |EXAMPLE | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> |
Co-deletion of 1p and 18q | Co-deletion of 1p and 18q | ||
Line 337: | Line 383: | ||
|No | |No | ||
|No | |No | ||
− | |EXAMPLE: | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> |
See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference). | See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference). | ||
Line 350: | Line 396: | ||
==Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)== | ==Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)== | ||
− | Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent and common as well either disease defining and/or clinically significant. Can include references in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable | + | Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent and common as well as either disease defining and/or clinically significant. Can include references in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable. Can also refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable as well as any high impact papers or reviews of gene mutations in this entity. Do not delete table.'') </span> |
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | !Gene; Genetic Alteration!!'''Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other)'''!!'''Prevalence (COSMIC / TCGA / Other)'''!!'''Concomitant Mutations'''!!'''Mutually Exclusive Mutations''' | + | !Gene; Genetic Alteration<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sh|first=Swerdlow|last2=Jr|first2=Cook|date=2020|title=As the world turns, evolving lymphoma classifications-past, present and future|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31493426/|language=en|pmid=31493426}}</ref>!!'''Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other)'''!!'''Prevalence (COSMIC / TCGA / Other)'''<ref name=":4" />!!'''Concomitant Mutations'''!!'''Mutually Exclusive Mutations''' |
!'''Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)''' | !'''Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)''' | ||
!Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | !Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | ||
Line 360: | Line 406: | ||
!Notes | !Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |SETD2 |
− | + | |TSG | |
− | + | |32% | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|YLPM1 | |YLPM1 | ||
− | | | + | |TSG |
|22% | |22% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TET2 | |TET2 | ||
− | | | + | |TSG |
|14% | |14% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|STAT5B | |STAT5B | ||
|Oncogene | |Oncogene | ||
|29% | |29% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|JAK1 | |JAK1 | ||
|Oncogene | |Oncogene | ||
− | |23% | + | |23% '''48%''' |
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|JAK3 | |JAK3 | ||
|Oncogene | |Oncogene | ||
|23% | |23% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|STAT3 | |STAT3 | ||
− | | | + | |oncogene |
− | |16% | + | |16%, '''38%''' |
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|SOCS1 | |SOCS1 | ||
− | | | + | |TSG |
|7% | |7% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''SOCS3''' | ||
+ | |'''TSG''' | ||
+ | |'''8%''' | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|NRAS | |NRAS | ||
|Oncogene | |Oncogene | ||
|10% | |10% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|KRAS | |KRAS | ||
|Oncogene | |Oncogene | ||
|6% | |6% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TP53 | |TP53 | ||
− | | | + | |TSG |
|10% | |10% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|BCL11B | |BCL11B | ||
− | | | + | |TSG |
|13% | |13% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|BRIP1 | |BRIP1 | ||
− | | | + | |TSG |
|16% | |16% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TERT | |TERT | ||
|Oncogene | |Oncogene | ||
|17% | |17% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|BBX | |BBX | ||
|Cell cycle transcription factor | |Cell cycle transcription factor | ||
|16% | |16% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|DAPK3 | |DAPK3 | ||
|Apoptosis | |Apoptosis | ||
|10% | |10% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|PRDM1 | |PRDM1 | ||
|Interferon-related transcription factor | |Interferon-related transcription factor | ||
|9% | |9% | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content. | ||
+ | |||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>The specific mutations in these genes may be found elsewhere ([https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic COSMIC], [https://www.cbioportal.org/ cBioPortal]) | <nowiki>*</nowiki>The specific mutations in these genes may be found elsewhere ([https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic COSMIC], [https://www.cbioportal.org/ cBioPortal]) | ||
*''PRDM1'' and ''DAPK3'', followed by ''STAT3'' and ''STAT5B'', are the most common mutually exclusive gene pairs<ref name=":4" /> | *''PRDM1'' and ''DAPK3'', followed by ''STAT3'' and ''STAT5B'', are the most common mutually exclusive gene pairs<ref name=":4" /> | ||
− | |||
==Epigenomic Alterations== | ==Epigenomic Alterations== | ||
Line 470: | Line 600: | ||
==Genes and Main Pathways Involved== | ==Genes and Main Pathways Involved== | ||
− | Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Can include references in the table.'')</span> | + | Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Can include references in the table. Do not delete table.'')</span> |
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Gene; Genetic Alteration!!Pathway!!Pathophysiologic Outcome | !Gene; Genetic Alteration!!Pathway!!Pathophysiologic Outcome | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |SETD2, TET2, YLPM1; loss of function mutations |
− | | | + | |Gene regulation |
− | |EXAMPLE: Increased cell growth and proliferation | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Increased cell growth and proliferation |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |JAK1, JAK3, STAT3, STAT5B, SOCS1 |
− | | | + | |JAK-STAT pathway |
− | |EXAMPLE: Unregulated cell division | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Unregulated cell division |
|- | |- | ||
− | |EXAMPLE: KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations |
− | |EXAMPLE: Histone modification, chromatin remodeling | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Histone modification, chromatin remodeling |
− | |EXAMPLE: Abnormal gene expression program | + | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Abnormal gene expression program |
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:37, 6 September 2024
Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)
This page is under construction |
editContent Update To WHO 5th Edition Classification Is In Process; Content Below is Based on WHO 4th Edition ClassificationThis page was converted to the new template on 2023-12-07. The original page can be found at HAEM4:Enteropathy-Associated T-cell Lymphoma.
(General Instructions – The main focus of these pages is the clinically significant genetic alterations in each disease type. Use HUGO-approved gene names and symbols (italicized when appropriate), HGVS-based nomenclature for variants, as well as generic names of drugs and testing platforms or assays if applicable. Please complete tables whenever possible and do not delete them (add N/A if not applicable in the table and delete the examples); to add (or move) a row or column to a table, click within the table and select the > symbol that appears to be given options. Please do not delete or alter the section headings. The use of bullet points alongside short blocks of text rather than only large paragraphs is encouraged. Additional instructions below in italicized blue text should not be included in the final page content. Please also see Author_Instructions and FAQs as well as contact your Associate Editor or Technical Support)
Primary Author(s)*
- FNU Monika, MBBS
- Andrew Siref, MD
WHO Classification of Disease
Structure | Disease |
---|---|
Book | Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.) |
Category | T-cell and NK-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas |
Family | Mature T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms |
Type | Intestinal T-cell and NK-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas |
Subtype(s) | Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma |
Definition / Description of Disease
- Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is an aggressive intestinal T-cell lymphoma more common in patients with celiac disease, especially type II refractory celiac disease (RCDII).
- Most of the EATL cases develop through an intermediate step of RCDII, however it can also arise de novo in patients with celiac disease. 33579790
- RCDII can be defined as failure to respond to a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months and is associated with clonal expansion of immunophenotypically an aberrant IELs [1], { 33707055 }.
- Celiac disease may be diagnosed prior to EATL diagnosis in 20-73% of cases, or both entities may be diagnosed concomitantly in 10-58% of the cases[1]
- Risk factors include homozygosity for HLA-DQ2 and advanced age[1]
Synonyms / Terminology
- None
Epidemiology / Prevalence
- 0.5-1 in 1 million general population (2-5% in patients with celiac disease, 60-80% in patients with refractory celiac disease type 2)[2][3][4][5][6]
- EATL accounts for 3% of peripheral T-cell lymphomas and represents 66% of all primary intestinal T-cell lymphomas[1]
- More common in regions with a high prevalence of CD, particularly Europe (0.05–0.14 cases per 100 000 population) { 15825131 ; 20197551 ; 18618372 } and the USA (0.016 cases per 100 000 population)
- Extremely rare in Asia due to low population frequency of celiac HLA risk alleles[2][3][4]
- > 60% of all cases in intestinal T- cell lymphomas[2][3][4]
- M:F 1.04:1 to 2.8:1[2][3][4]
- 6th-7th decade of life[2][3][4]
- Mostly Caucasian (> 90%)[2][3][4]
Clinical Features
Many of the below features are indistinguishable from the presentation of celiac disease, which may delay the diagnosis of EATL. Persistent symptoms following gluten-free diet is highly suggestive of EATL.[3]
Signs and Symptoms |
|
Laboratory Findings |
|
- CD can be diagnosed at the time of EATL diagnosis[1]
- Patients with RCD can sometimes present with small-intestinal ulceration (ulcerative jejunitis) { 9250161 ; 10381521 }.
If there is no prior diagnosis of celiac disease and lymphoma is the initial presentation, the following findings can point towards celiac disease associated EATL:
- Anti-tissue transglutaminase-2 antibodies or Anti-endomysial antibodies
- Dermatitis herpetiformis
Sites of Involvement
- Small intestine (predominantly jejunum and ileum > large intestine and stomach)[3]
- Dissemination to extra gastrointestinal sites: mesenteric and abdominal lymph nodes > bone marrow, lung, liver or skin { 8583077 ; 23313469 ; 21566094 }.
- Metastases involve intra-abdominal node > bone marrow > lung > liver > skin[3]
- CNS (rare)[3]
Morphologic Features
- Pleomorphic medium to large sized neoplastic lymphoid cells with immunoblastic or anaplastic morphology.[4][1]
- Angulated vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and a pale-staining cytoplasm [https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162629]
- Extensive inflammatory background of histiocytes, eosinophils, small lymphocytes, and plasma cells [1]
- Adjacent mucosa often displays the histological features of active CD, including increased IEL infiltration, crypt hyperplasia, and villous atrophy [4][1] [https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162629]
- Angioinvasion and angiodestruction are commonly seen [1]
- Neighborhood mucosa characterized by villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia (non-malignant areas of celiac disease)[4]
- Round or angulated vesicular nuclei[4]
- Prominent nucleoli[4]
- Moderate-abundant pale cytoplasm[4]
- Extensive admixture of inflammatory cells (eosinophils, histiocytes)[4]
- Angiocentric and angioinvasive features with extensive necrosis[4]
Immunophenotype
- The most common immunophenotypic profile in EATL is given below:
Finding | Marker |
---|---|
Positive (universal) | CD3, CD7 |
Positive (frequent) | CD30 (harbinger of transformation to EATL from RCD2), NKP46 (not seen in IEL of CD or RCD1), CD103,
cytotoxic granule-associated markers (TIA1, granzyme B, perforin) |
Negative (frequent) | CD4, CD8, CD5, CD56, TCR, EBER |
Ki-67 | high |
- Approximately 25% of EATLs (primarily de novo EATL) are CD8+, and rare cases express TCRγδ [23313469, 26462278]
- Ki-67 is very low and CD30 is negative in RCDII, their appearance is useful to monitor RCDII progression to EATL and to indicate the need for chemotherapeutic regimens targeting dividing cells, a therapeutic option that is inefficient and even dangerous in RCDII. 33579790
RCD Type 1 | RCD Type 2 | EATL | |
---|---|---|---|
Histopathology | Identical to uncomplicated CD | Moderate/ severe villous atrophy with atypical IELs | Infiltration of medium to large sized pleomorphic IELs |
IEL Immunophenotype | Like CD; sCD3+, CD8+ | ||
Immunophenotype of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL):[7][8]
- Varies depending on background type 1 or type 2 refractory celiac disease (RCD).
- Type 1 (RCD1):
- Milder symptoms with high 5-year survival with low risk of EATL development
- Flow cytometry: sCD3+, CD8+, CD5+
- Type 2 (RCD2):
- Severe symptoms with protein-losing enteropathy leads to malnourishment (BMI < 18); low 5-year survival with increased risk of EATL
- Flow cytometry: sCD3_, CD8-, CD5-
- IHC:
- NKP46: significantly more positive in RCD2 IEL than normal IEL in CD and RCD1; not specific for RCD2 or EATL, can be seen in MEITL; not seen in indolent T-cell LPD of GI tract
- CD30+ indicates progression to EATL
- Type 1 (RCD1):
Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)
No recurrent gene fusions have been reported.
editv4:Clinical Significance (Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications).Please incorporate this section into the relevant tables found in:
- Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)
- Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
- Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns
- Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)
- Diagnosis
- Prognosis
- In one study, >3 chromosomal imbalance was associated with worse prognosis[9]
- Therapeutic Implications
- Recurrent mutations in epigenetic machinery genes - epigenetic modifying drugs may be effective[12]
- Mutations involved in JAK-STAT signaling pathway - inhibitors of this pathway may be effective
- Suboptimal response to chemotherapy due to malnutrition, intestinal complications and toxicity and malnutrition
- CD30+ disease may benefit from brentuximab vedotin (adcetris) as second line with or without stem cell transplant[13][14]
- No FDA-approved targeted therapies currently available[15]
Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH
Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene fusions. Can include references in the table. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable. Do not delete table.)
Chr # | Gain / Loss / Amp / LOH | Minimal Region Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build] | Minimal Region Cytoband | Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9 | gain | 9q | q22-34 | EXAMPLE:
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference). | |||
16 | loss | 16q | 12.1 | EXAMPLE:
Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference). | |||
1 | gain | 1q | q22-44 | ||||
5 | gain | 5q | q33.3–34 | ||||
9 | LOH | 9p | p21 | ||||
7 | gain | 7q | q11.21-q36.1 | ||||
8 | loss | 8p | p23.3-p11.21 | ||||
8 | gain | 8q | q24 | ||||
13 | loss | 13q | |||||
17 | loss | 17p | p12-13.2 |
editv4:Genomic Gain/Loss/LOHThe content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.
Chromosome Number[8][16][9][10][17] Gain/Loss/Amp/LOH Region Genes Prevalence 9q gain q22-34 C-ABL1, NOTCH-1, VAV2, CARD9 40-71% 16q loss 12.1 CLYD 23% 1q gain q22-44 CKS1B 30% 5q gain q33.3–34 UBLCP1, IRGM-1 17%-30% 9p LOH p21 CDKN2A/B (p16) 36%; possibly more common in (5 of 9) cases with large cells[18] 7q gain q11.21-q36.1 NSUN5 24% 8p loss p23.3-p11.21 20-30% 8q gain q24 MYC 25-27% 13q loss RB 24% 17p loss p12-13.2 TP53 23%
- Most copy number alterations are large arm level alterations; no focal gene level alterations reach statistical significance[10]
Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns
Put your text here (EXAMPLE PATTERNS: hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis. Do not delete table.)
Chromosomal Pattern | Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
EXAMPLE:
Co-deletion of 1p and 18q |
Yes | No | No | EXAMPLE:
See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference). |
editv4:Characteristic Chromosomal Aberrations / PatternsThe content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.
Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)
Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent and common as well as either disease defining and/or clinically significant. Can include references in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable. Can also refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable as well as any high impact papers or reviews of gene mutations in this entity. Do not delete table.)
Gene; Genetic Alteration[10][20] | Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other) | Prevalence (COSMIC / TCGA / Other)[10] | Concomitant Mutations | Mutually Exclusive Mutations | Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SETD2 | TSG | 32% | ||||||
YLPM1 | TSG | 22% | ||||||
TET2 | TSG | 14% | ||||||
STAT5B | Oncogene | 29% | ||||||
JAK1 | Oncogene | 23% 48% | ||||||
JAK3 | Oncogene | 23% | ||||||
STAT3 | oncogene | 16%, 38% | ||||||
SOCS1 | TSG | 7% | ||||||
SOCS3 | TSG | 8% | ||||||
NRAS | Oncogene | 10% | ||||||
KRAS | Oncogene | 6% | ||||||
TP53 | TSG | 10% | ||||||
BCL11B | TSG | 13% | ||||||
BRIP1 | TSG | 16% | ||||||
TERT | Oncogene | 17% | ||||||
BBX | Cell cycle transcription factor | 16% | ||||||
DAPK3 | Apoptosis | 10% | ||||||
PRDM1 | Interferon-related transcription factor | 9% |
Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.
*The specific mutations in these genes may be found elsewhere (COSMIC, cBioPortal)
- PRDM1 and DAPK3, followed by STAT3 and STAT5B, are the most common mutually exclusive gene pairs[10]
Epigenomic Alterations
- SETD2 is a histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase (forms H3K37me3)[10]
- Altered (mostly by loss-of-function mutations) in ~32% of EATL
- Results in global H3K36 hypomethylation
Genes and Main Pathways Involved
Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Can include references in the table. Do not delete table.)
Gene; Genetic Alteration | Pathway | Pathophysiologic Outcome |
---|---|---|
SETD2, TET2, YLPM1; loss of function mutations | Gene regulation | EXAMPLE: Increased cell growth and proliferation |
JAK1, JAK3, STAT3, STAT5B, SOCS1 | JAK-STAT pathway | EXAMPLE: Unregulated cell division |
EXAMPLE: KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations | EXAMPLE: Histone modification, chromatin remodeling | EXAMPLE: Abnormal gene expression program |
editv4:Genes and Main Pathways InvolvedThe content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.
- Chromatin modifying genes: SETD2, TET2, YLPM1; loss of function mutations[10][21][22][23]
- JAK-STAT pathway: JAK1, JAK3, STAT3, STAT5B, SOCS1; mutated drivers in this pathway tended to be mutually exclusive[10][21][22][23]
- RAS/MAPK signaling pathway[10][21][22][23]
- IL-15 deregulation and disruption of intestinal immune homeostasis[10][21][22][23]
- Overexpression of genes involved in Interferon-γ signaling[10]
Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods
- No specific recurrent genetic abnormalities that are diagnostic for EATL[24][25]
- Clonality can be confirmed by T-cell receptor gene rearrangement studies[24][25]
- Chromosomal microarrays may identify genetic abnormalities frequently associated with EATL[24][25]
- Next generation sequencing may identify genetic abnormalities frequently associated with EATL[24][25]
- Morphology and immunophenotyping
- Cut-off value of 20% aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes (cytoplasmic CD3+, surface CD3−, CD7+, CD103+, CD8−, CD4−) to distinguish from refractory celiac disease[26]
Familial Forms
- While there is a genetic predisposition of those with HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 to develop celiac disease and EATL is a complication of celiac disease, familial forms of EATL are not described.
Additional Information
- N/A
Links
References
(use the "Cite" icon at the top of the page) (Instructions: Add each reference into the text above by clicking on where you want to insert the reference, selecting the “Cite” icon at the top of the page, and using the “Automatic” tab option to search such as by PMID to select the reference to insert. The reference list in this section will be automatically generated and sorted. If a PMID is not available, such as for a book, please use the “Cite” icon, select “Manual” and then “Basic Form”, and include the entire reference.)
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Govind Bhagat, et al. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024 [cited 2024 July 2]. (WHO classification of tumors series, 5th ed.; vol. 11). Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chaptercontent/63/224
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Wh, Verbeek; et al. (2008). "Incidence of enteropathy--associated T-cell lymphoma: a nation-wide study of a population-based registry in The Netherlands". PMID 18618372.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Aj, Ferreri; et al. (2011). "Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma". PMID 20655757.
- ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 J, Delabie; et al. (2011). "Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: clinical and histological findings from the international peripheral T-cell lymphoma project". PMID 21566094.
- ↑ A, Rubio-Tapia; et al. (2010). "Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease". doi:10.1136/gut.2009.195131. PMC 2861306. PMID 20332526.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
- ↑ G, Malamut; et al. (2009). "Presentation and long-term follow-up of refractory celiac disease: comparison of type I with type II". PMID 19014942.
- ↑ P, Domizio; et al. (1993). "Primary lymphoma of the small intestine. A clinicopathological study of 119 cases". PMID 8470758.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Deleeuw, Ronald J.; et al. (2007-05). "Whole-genome analysis and HLA genotyping of enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma reveals 2 distinct lymphoma subtypes". Gastroenterology. 132 (5): 1902–1911. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.036. ISSN 0016-5085. PMID 17484883. Check date values in:
|date=
(help) - ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 A, Zettl; et al. (2002). "Chromosomal gains at 9q characterize enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma". doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64441-0. PMC 1850794. PMID 12414511.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
- ↑ 10.00 10.01 10.02 10.03 10.04 10.05 10.06 10.07 10.08 10.09 10.10 10.11 Ab, Moffitt; et al. (2017). "Enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma subtypes are characterized by loss of function of SETD2". doi:10.1084/jem.20160894. PMC 5413324. PMID 28424246.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
- ↑ Roberti, Annalisa; et al. (09 07, 2016). "Type II enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma features a unique genomic profile with highly recurrent SETD2 alterations". Nature Communications. 7: 12602. doi:10.1038/ncomms12602. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 5023950. PMID 27600764. Check date values in:
|date=
(help) - ↑ Zhang, Ping; et al. (2020-11-07). "Epigenetic alterations and advancement of treatment in peripheral T-cell lymphoma". Clinical Epigenetics. 12 (1): 169. doi:10.1186/s13148-020-00962-x. ISSN 1868-7083. PMC PMC7648940 Check
|pmc=
value (help). PMID 33160401 Check|pmid=
value (help).CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ↑ Sm, Horwitz; et al. (2014). "Objective responses in relapsed T-cell lymphomas with single-agent brentuximab vedotin". doi:10.1182/blood-2013-12-542142. PMC 4425442. PMID 24652992.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
- ↑ Fanale, Michelle A.; et al. (2018-05-10). "Five-year outcomes for frontline brentuximab vedotin with CHP for CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas". Blood. 131 (19): 2120–2124. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-12-821009. ISSN 0006-4971. PMC 5946765. PMID 29507077.
- ↑ National Comprehensive Cancer Network (January 2021). "NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas" (PDF).CS1 maint: display-authors (link)
- ↑ Ak, Baumgärtner; et al. (2003). "High frequency of genetic aberrations in enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma". PMID 14563952.
- ↑ Tomita, Sakura; et al. (2015-10). "Genomic and immunohistochemical profiles of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma in Japan". Modern Pathology. 28 (10): 1286–1296. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2015.85. ISSN 1530-0285. Check date values in:
|date=
(help) - ↑ Obermann, E. C.; et al. (2004-02). "Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 9p21 is a frequent finding in enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma". The Journal of Pathology. 202 (2): 252–262. doi:10.1002/path.1506. ISSN 0022-3417. PMID 14743509. Check date values in:
|date=
(help) - ↑ A, Al-Toma; et al. (2006). "Human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 homozygosity and the development of refractory celiac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma". PMID 16527694.
- ↑ Sh, Swerdlow; et al. (2020). "As the world turns, evolving lymphoma classifications-past, present and future". PMID 31493426.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 A, Nicolae; et al. (2016). "Mutations in the JAK/STAT and RAS signaling pathways are common in intestinal T-cell lymphomas". doi:10.1038/leu.2016.178. PMC 5093023. PMID 27389054.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 G, Malamut; et al. (2010). "IL-15 triggers an antiapoptotic pathway in human intraepithelial lymphocytes that is a potential new target in celiac disease-associated inflammation and lymphomagenesis". doi:10.1172/JCI41344. PMC 2877946. PMID 20440074.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 Mention, Jean-Jacques; et al. (2003-09). "Interleukin 15: a key to disrupted intraepithelial lymphocyte homeostasis and lymphomagenesis in celiac disease". Gastroenterology. 125 (3): 730–745. doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(03)01047-3. ISSN 0016-5085. PMID 12949719. Check date values in:
|date=
(help) - ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 A, Di Sabatino; et al. (2012). "How I treat enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma". PMID 22271451.
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 Sj, Van Weyenberg; et al. (2011). "MR enteroclysis in refractory celiac disease: proposal and validation of a severity scoring system". PMID 21330559.
- ↑ Wh, Verbeek; et al. (2008). "Flow cytometric determination of aberrant intra-epithelial lymphocytes predicts T-cell lymphoma development more accurately than T-cell clonality analysis in Refractory Celiac Disease". PMID 18024205.
- ↑ A, Al-Toma; et al. (2006). "Human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 homozygosity and the development of refractory celiac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma". PMID 16527694.
- ↑ Deleeuw, Ronald J.; et al. (2007-05). "Whole-genome analysis and HLA genotyping of enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma reveals 2 distinct lymphoma subtypes". Gastroenterology. 132 (5): 1902–1911. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.036. ISSN 0016-5085. PMID 17484883. Check date values in:
|date=
(help)
Notes
*Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page. If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the CCGA coordinators (contact information provided on the homepage). Additional global feedback or concerns are also welcome. *Citation of this Page: “Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated 09/6/2024, https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:Enteropathy-associated_T-cell_lymphoma.