Changes

STBT5:Solitary fibrous tumour (view source)

Revision as of 07:55, 22 April 2024

5 bytes removed , 22 April

Line 164: Line 164:

|Yes<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Machado|first=Isidro|last2=Morales|first2=Gema Nieto|last3=Cruz|first3=Julia|last4=Lavernia|first4=Javier|last5=Giner|first5=Francisco|last6=Navarro|first6=Samuel|last7=Ferrandez|first7=Antonio|last8=Llombart-Bosch|first8=Antonio|date=2020-04|title=Solitary fibrous tumor: a case series identifying pathological adverse factors-implications for risk stratification and classification|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31529158|journal=Virchows Archiv: An International Journal of Pathology|volume=476|issue=4|pages=597–607|doi=10.1007/s00428-019-02660-3|issn=1432-2307|pmid=31529158}}</ref><ref name=":4" />

|No

−

|Single base pair substitution have been identified in exon 5 or exon 6 of TP53. <ref name=":3" /> Mutations of TP53 have been associated with malignant and dedifferentiated SFTs.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dagrada|first=Gian P.|last2=Spagnuolo|first2=Rosalin D.|last3=Mauro|first3=Valentina|last4=Tamborini|first4=Elena|last5=Cesana|first5=Luca|last6=Gronchi|first6=Alessandro|last7=Stacchiotti|first7=Silvia|last8=Pierotti|first8=Marco A.|last9=Negri|first9=Tiziana|date=2015-08|title=Solitary fibrous tumors: loss of chimeric protein expression and genomic instability mark dedifferentiation|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26022454|journal=Modern Pathology: An Official Journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc|volume=28|issue=8|pages=1074–1083|doi=10.1038/modpathol.2015.70|issn=1530-0285|pmid=26022454}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kurisaki-Arakawa|first=Aiko|last2=Akaike|first2=Keisuke|last3=Hara|first3=Kieko|last4=Arakawa|first4=Atsushi|last5=Takahashi|first5=Michiko|last6=Mitani|first6=Keiko|last7=Yao|first7=Takashi|last8=Saito|first8=Tsuyoshi|date=2014-11|title=A case of dedifferentiated solitary fibrous tumor in the pelvis with TP53 mutation|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25015562|journal=Virchows Archiv: An International Journal of Pathology|volume=465|issue=5|pages=615–621|doi=10.1007/s00428-014-1625-3|issn=1432-2307|pmid=25015562}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Nonaka|first=Haruna|last2=Kandori|first2=Shuya|last3=Nitta|first3=Satoshi|last4=Shiga|first4=Masanobu|last5=Nagumo|first5=Yoshiyuki|last6=Kimura|first6=Tomokazu|last7=Kawahara|first7=Takashi|last8=Negoro|first8=Hiromitsu|last9=Hoshi|first9=Akio|date=2021|title=Case Report: Molecular Characterization of Aggressive Malignant Retroperitoneal Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Case Study|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35004271|journal=Frontiers in Oncology|volume=11|pages=736969|doi=10.3389/fonc.2021.736969|issn=2234-943X|pmc=8727594|pmid=35004271}}</ref>

+

|Single base pair substitution have been identified in exon 5 or exon 6 of TP53. <ref name=":3" /> Mutations of TP53 have been associated with malignant and dedifferentiated SFTs.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dagrada|first=Gian P.|last2=Spagnuolo|first2=Rosalin D.|last3=Mauro|first3=Valentina|last4=Tamborini|first4=Elena|last5=Cesana|first5=Luca|last6=Gronchi|first6=Alessandro|last7=Stacchiotti|first7=Silvia|last8=Pierotti|first8=Marco A.|last9=Negri|first9=Tiziana|date=2015-08|title=Solitary fibrous tumors: loss of chimeric protein expression and genomic instability mark dedifferentiation|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26022454|journal=Modern Pathology: An Official Journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc|volume=28|issue=8|pages=1074–1083|doi=10.1038/modpathol.2015.70|issn=1530-0285|pmid=26022454}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kurisaki-Arakawa|first=Aiko|last2=Akaike|first2=Keisuke|last3=Hara|first3=Kieko|last4=Arakawa|first4=Atsushi|last5=Takahashi|first5=Michiko|last6=Mitani|first6=Keiko|last7=Yao|first7=Takashi|last8=Saito|first8=Tsuyoshi|date=2014-11|title=A case of dedifferentiated solitary fibrous tumor in the pelvis with TP53 mutation|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25015562|journal=Virchows Archiv: An International Journal of Pathology|volume=465|issue=5|pages=615–621|doi=10.1007/s00428-014-1625-3|issn=1432-2307|pmid=25015562}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Nonaka|first=Haruna|last2=Kandori|first2=Shuya|last3=Nitta|first3=Satoshi|last4=Shiga|first4=Masanobu|last5=Nagumo|first5=Yoshiyuki|last6=Kimura|first6=Tomokazu|last7=Kawahara|first7=Takashi|last8=Negoro|first8=Hiromitsu|last9=Hoshi|first9=Akio|date=2021|title=Case Report: Molecular Characterization of Aggressive Malignant Retroperitoneal Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Case Study|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35004271|journal=Frontiers in Oncology|volume=11|pages=736969|doi=10.3389/fonc.2021.736969|issn=2234-943X|pmc=8727594|pmid=35004271}}</ref>

|-

|APAF1

Line 188: Line 188:

|}

==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods==

−

Ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry and molecular tests are useful in differentiating soft tissue tumors. SFTs have historically been diagnosed by morphology and strong diffuse CD34 positivity. Additional immunohistochemical phenotype previously used for identification included expression of Bcl2, CD99, and vimentin and absence of expression of epithelial, muscle, and neural markers. However, the introduction of STAT6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6) immunostain now dominates due to its high sensitivity and specificity. STAT6 expression is demonstrated by nuclear staining. ~~Molecular testing by next~~ generation sequencing is also highly useful in detecting the NAB2::STAT6 fusion. Breakapart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe for STAT6 can detect rearrangement of this gene. In the context of SFT, the rearrangement of the ''STAT6'' gene is highly suggestive for the presence of ''NAB2-STAT6'' fusion. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27802414/ A dual color dual fusion probe targeting both genes would be a direct confirmation for ''NAB2-STAT6'' fusion.]

+

Ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry and molecular tests are useful in differentiating soft tissue tumors. SFTs have historically been diagnosed by morphology and strong diffuse CD34 positivity. Additional immunohistochemical phenotype previously used for identification included expression of Bcl2, CD99, and vimentin and absence of expression of epithelial, muscle, and neural markers. However, the introduction of STAT6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6) immunostain now dominates due to its high sensitivity and specificity. STAT6 expression is demonstrated by nuclear staining. Next generation sequencing (NGS) using mRNA is also highly useful in detecting the NAB2::STAT6 fusion. Breakapart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe for STAT6 can detect rearrangement of this gene. In the context of SFT, the rearrangement of the ''STAT6'' gene is highly suggestive for the presence of ''NAB2-STAT6'' fusion. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27802414/ A dual color dual fusion probe targeting both genes would be a direct confirmation for ''NAB2-STAT6'' fusion.]

==Familial Forms==

Not Applicable

Reba.Daniel

11

edits