Changes

==Primary Author(s)*==

==Primary Author(s)*==

Dr Kay Weng Choy MBBS, BMedSci, FAACB, Monash Health

Kay Weng Choy, MBBS, Monash Medical Centre

__TOC__

__TOC__

==Cancer Category/Type==

==Cancer Category/Type==

[[Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Related Precursor Neoplasms]]

[[HAEM4:Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Related Precursor Neoplasms]]

 

 

''FLT3'' mutations occur in about one-third of patients with AML [3]. In-frame duplications of 3 to >400 base pairs, also known as internal tandem duplications (ITDs), are the most common mutations in ''FLT3'' and they occur in up to 30% of adult patients with ''de novo'' AML [3,4,5,6]. About 70% of ''FLT3''-ITDs occur in the JMD and about 30% in the TKD [3]. The JMD inhibits activation of the receptor by steric hindrance, preventing the TKD from assuming an active conformation; presence of an ITD causes loss of this inhibitory effect, resulting in activation of the TKD.

''FLT3'' mutations occur in about one-third of patients with AML [3]. In-frame duplications of 3 to >400 base pairs, also known as internal tandem duplications (ITDs), are the most common mutations in ''FLT3'' and they occur in up to 30% of adult patients with ''de novo'' AML [3,4,5,6]. About 70% of ''FLT3''-ITDs occur in the JMD and about 30% in the TKD [3]. The JMD inhibits activation of the receptor by steric hindrance, preventing the TKD from assuming an active conformation; presence of an ITD causes loss of this inhibitory effect, resulting in activation of the TKD.

==Common Alteration Types==

==Common Alteration Types==

In-frame duplications of 3 to >400 base pairs, also known as internal tandem duplications (ITDs), are the most common mutations in ''FLT3'' and they occur in up to 30% of adult patients with ''de novo'' AML [3,4,5,6]. About 70% of ''FLT3''-ITDs occur in the JMD and about 30% in the TKD. See Figure in [3].  The second most common type of ''FLT3'' mutations in AML are those within the TKD (occurring in up to 14% of adult patients with AML) [3]. The majority are point mutations within the activation loop (e.g., residues D835, I836, Y842) of the TKD2, and within the TKD1 (e.g., residues N676, F691) [3,11]; activating mutations caused by insertions (e.g., insertion of glycine and serine between residues S840 and N841) and deletions have also been found in TKD [3].  Additional ''FLT3'' point mutations that have been found in patients with AML include mutations within the extracellular domain (e.g. T167, V194, D324, Y364, and V491), transmembrane domain (e.g., I548, V557), JMD (e.g., V579, E598), TKD1 (e.g., A680, M737), and TKD2 (e.g., V816, A814, T784). See Figure in [3].

In-frame duplications of 3 to >400 base pairs, also known as internal tandem duplications (ITDs), are the most common mutations in ''FLT3'' and they occur in up to 30% of adult patients with ''de novo'' AML [3,4,5,6]. About 70% of ''FLT3''-ITDs occur in the JMD and about 30% in the TKD. See Figure in [3].  The second most common type of ''FLT3'' mutations in AML are those within the TKD (occurring in up to 14% of adult patients with AML) [3]. The majority are point mutations within the activation loop (e.g., residues D835, I836, Y842) of the TKD2, and within the TKD1 (e.g., residues N676, F691) [3,7]; activating mutations caused by insertions (e.g., insertion of glycine and serine between residues S840 and N841) and deletions have also been found in TKD [3].  Additional ''FLT3'' point mutations that have been found in patients with AML include mutations within the extracellular domain (e.g. T167, V194, D324, Y364, and V491), transmembrane domain (e.g., I548, V557), JMD (e.g., V579, E598), TKD1 (e.g., A680, M737), and TKD2 (e.g., V816, A814, T784). See Figure in [3].

{| class="wikitable sortable"

{| class="wikitable sortable"

|-

|-

! Copy Number Loss   !! Copy Number Gain   !! LOH   !!   Loss-of-Function Mutation   !! Gain-of-Function Mutation !! Translocation/Fusion  

!Copy Number Loss!!Copy Number Gain!!LOH!!Loss-of-Function Mutation!!Gain-of-Function Mutation!!Translocation/Fusion

|-

|-

| || ||   || || X ||  

| || || || ||X||

|}

|}

==Internal Pages==

==Internal Pages==

==External Links==

==External Links==

6. Patel JP, et al., (2012). Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 366(12):1079-1089. PMID 22417203.

6. Patel JP, et al., (2012). Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 366(12):1079-1089. PMID 22417203.

== Notes ==

 

==Notes==

<nowiki>*</nowiki>Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page.  If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the CCGA coordinators (contact information provided on the homepage).  Additional global feedback or concerns are also welcome.

<nowiki>*</nowiki>Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page.  If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the CCGA coordinators (contact information provided on the homepage).  Additional global feedback or concerns are also welcome.