Difference between revisions of "TestAMLtable"
[unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ==Recurrent Genomic Alterations in AML Based on Literature Review== | + | ==Recurrent Genomic Alterations in AML Detected by Chromosomal Microarray Based on Literature Review== |
− | Table 1 - A comprehensive list of | + | Table 1 - A comprehensive list of CNAs and CN-LOH detectable by CMA testing with strong diagnostic, prognostic and treatment implications in AML. Table derived from Xu et al., 2018 [PMID 30344013] with permission from Cancer Genetics. |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 16:29, 4 November 2018
Recurrent Genomic Alterations in AML Detected by Chromosomal Microarray Based on Literature Review
Table 1 - A comprehensive list of CNAs and CN-LOH detectable by CMA testing with strong diagnostic, prognostic and treatment implications in AML. Table derived from Xu et al., 2018 [PMID 30344013] with permission from Cancer Genetics.
Chromosome | AML Subtype | Abnormality Type (Amplification, Loss, CN-LOH) | Region | Relevant Genes (if known) | Clinical Significance | Level of Evidence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AML including NK-AML | CN-LOH | 1p | D | 3 | |
2 | AML | CN-LOH | 2p | DNMT3A | D | 3 |
3 | NK-AML, sAML | Loss | 3p14.1 | FOXP1 | D | 3 |
4 | sAML, pAML | CN-LOH | 4q24 | TET2 | D | 3 |
4 | AML, NK-AML, sAML | Loss | 4q24 | TET2 | D, P | 3 |
5 | pAML, sAML | Loss | 5q | D | 1 | |
6 | AML including NK-AML | CN-LOH | 6p | D | 3 | |
7 | AML including NK-AML | CN-LOH | 7q | EZH2 | D | 3 |
7 | NK-AML, pAML, sAML | Loss | 7q | EZH2, CUX1 | D | 1 |
8 | AML with complex karyotype | Amplification | 8q24 | MYC | D, P | 3 |
9 | NK-AML, sAML | CN-LOH | 9p | JAK2 | D | 3 |
11* | AML with complex karyotype | Amplification | 11q23 | MLL (KMT2A) | D, P | 3 |
11* | AML | CN-LOH | 11p | WT1 | D | 3 |
11 | pAML, sAML, NK-AML | CN-LOH | 11q | CBL | D | 3 |
12 | AML, NK-AML, AML with complex karyotype, sAML | Loss | 12p13.2 | ETV6 | D | 3 |
13* | pAML, NK-AML, NPM1 mutated AML, FLT3-ITD positive AML, sAML | CN-LOH | 13q | FLT3 | D, P | 2 |
16 | NK-AML, AML with complex karyotype, pAML, sAML | Loss | 16q | CBFB | D | 3 |
17 | AML, NK-AML, pAML, sAML | CN-LOH | 17p | TP53 | D | 3 |
17 | sAML, NK-AML, AML with complex karyotype, de novo AML | Loss | 17p | TP53 | D, P | 1 |
17 | NK-AML, pAML | Loss | 17q11.2 | NF1, SUZ12 | D, P | 3 |
19* | AML, NK-AML, sAML | CN-LOH | 19q | CEBPA | D | 3 |
20 | sAML | Loss | 20q | D | 3 | |
21* | pAML, AML with complex karyotype | Amplification | 21q22 | ERG, ETS2 | D, P, T | 3 |
21* | AML, NK-AML, sAML | CN-LOH | 21q | RUNX1 | D | 3 |
21* | sAML | Loss | 21q22.12 | RUNX1 | D | 3 |
D = diagnostic significance; P = prognostic significance; T = therapeutic significance. Classification of levels of evidence: Level 1 = WHO classification or professional practice guidelines; Level 2 = well-powered studies with consensus from experts in the field; Level 3 = multiple small studies without any contradicting data; Level 4 = individual small studies, case reports, preclinical studies.
Abrreviations: CMA = chromosomal microarray; CNA = copy number aberration; CN-LOH = copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity; AML = acute myeloid leukemia; NK-AML = normal karyotype AML; pAML = primary AML; and sAML = secondary AML.
The * indicates CNAs and CN-LOH regions that are predominantly seen in AML.
Reference
1. Xu X, Bryke C, Sukhanova M, Huxley E, Dash DP, Dixon-Mciver A, Fang M, Griepp PT, Hodge JC, Iqbal A, Jeffries S, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Quintero-Rivera F, Shetty S, Slovak ML, Yenamandra A, Lennon PA, Raca G. (2018). Assessing copy number abnormalities and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity across the genome as best practice in diagnostic evaluation of acute myeloid leukemia: An evidence-based review from the cancer genomics consortium (CGC) myeloid neoplasms working group. Cancer Genet [Epub ahead of print], PMID 30344013.