Difference between revisions of "HAEM5:Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with JAK2 rearrangement"

From Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
Line 78: Line 78:
  
  
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Clinical Features|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
+
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Clinical Features|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote>
  
 
Patients typically present with features of a myeloproliferative disorder or MDS/MPN and most have eosinophilia and/or bone marrow  fibrosis<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Hoeller|first=Sylvia|last2=Walz|first2=Christoph|last3=Reiter|first3=Andreas|last4=Dirnhofer|first4=Stephan|last5=Tzankov|first5=Alexandar|date=2011|title=PCM1–JAK2-fusion: a potential treatment target in myelodysplastic–myeloproliferative and other hemato-lymphoid neoplasms|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1517/14728222.2011.538683|journal=Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets|language=en|volume=15|issue=1|pages=53–62|doi=10.1517/14728222.2011.538683|issn=1472-8222}}</ref>. Patients in chronic phase tend to progress to AML quickly; some present with de novo acute leukemia, either myeloid or lymphoid<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /><sup> </sup>
 
Patients typically present with features of a myeloproliferative disorder or MDS/MPN and most have eosinophilia and/or bone marrow  fibrosis<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Hoeller|first=Sylvia|last2=Walz|first2=Christoph|last3=Reiter|first3=Andreas|last4=Dirnhofer|first4=Stephan|last5=Tzankov|first5=Alexandar|date=2011|title=PCM1–JAK2-fusion: a potential treatment target in myelodysplastic–myeloproliferative and other hemato-lymphoid neoplasms|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1517/14728222.2011.538683|journal=Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets|language=en|volume=15|issue=1|pages=53–62|doi=10.1517/14728222.2011.538683|issn=1472-8222}}</ref>. Patients in chronic phase tend to progress to AML quickly; some present with de novo acute leukemia, either myeloid or lymphoid<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /><sup> </sup>
Line 84: Line 84:
 
In general, patients with this disorder have weakness/fatigue (~26%), cough (~24%), myaligias/angioedema (~14%), rash or fever (~12%) and rhinitis (~10%)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gotlib|first=Jason|date=2017|title=World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management|url=http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ajh.24880|journal=American Journal of Hematology|language=en|volume=92|issue=11|pages=1243–1259|doi=10.1002/ajh.24880}}</ref> ; lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly are common<ref name=":2" />  
 
In general, patients with this disorder have weakness/fatigue (~26%), cough (~24%), myaligias/angioedema (~14%), rash or fever (~12%) and rhinitis (~10%)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gotlib|first=Jason|date=2017|title=World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management|url=http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ajh.24880|journal=American Journal of Hematology|language=en|volume=92|issue=11|pages=1243–1259|doi=10.1002/ajh.24880}}</ref> ; lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly are common<ref name=":2" />  
  
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
==Sites of Involvement==
 
==Sites of Involvement==
Line 111: Line 114:
  
  
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Immunophenotype|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
+
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Immunophenotype|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote>
  
 
IHC can be used to characterize acute myeloid transformation and myeloblasts express dim CD45, dim CD34, dim CD117, HLA-DR, dim CD33, and dim CD13<ref name=":0" />. In addition, For the cases with lymphoid components, IHC can assist with assessment and show dim CD19 and dim CD10, consistent with lymphoblast lineage<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" />.
 
IHC can be used to characterize acute myeloid transformation and myeloblasts express dim CD45, dim CD34, dim CD117, HLA-DR, dim CD33, and dim CD13<ref name=":0" />. In addition, For the cases with lymphoid components, IHC can assist with assessment and show dim CD19 and dim CD10, consistent with lymphoblast lineage<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" />.
  
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
==Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)==
 
==Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)==
Line 139: Line 145:
 
 
  
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
+
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote>
  
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
Line 149: Line 155:
 
|}
 
|}
 
 
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
Line 156: Line 165:
 
* Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
 
* Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
 
* Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns
 
* Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns
* Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)}}
+
* Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)}}</blockquote>
 
Most patients present with MPN with variable degrees of eosinophilia in blood and/or bone marrow, frequent marrow fibrosis, and large aggregates of immature erythroid precursors, and clinically exhibit hepatosplenomegagly and lymphadenopathy<ref name=":2" />. However, diagnosis may be difficult in cases without obvious eosinophilia.  
 
Most patients present with MPN with variable degrees of eosinophilia in blood and/or bone marrow, frequent marrow fibrosis, and large aggregates of immature erythroid precursors, and clinically exhibit hepatosplenomegagly and lymphadenopathy<ref name=":2" />. However, diagnosis may be difficult in cases without obvious eosinophilia.  
  
 
Due to the variations in presentation, the prognosis is mainly dependent on the phase at presentation, but generally tends to have an aggressive course<sup>1</sup>. There currently are no approved therapies for ''PCM1/JAK2''-mediated myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia; however, ''JAK2'' inhibitors have been approved for other hematopoietic neoplasms with constitutively activated ''JAK2'' kinases.<sup>2</sup>
 
Due to the variations in presentation, the prognosis is mainly dependent on the phase at presentation, but generally tends to have an aggressive course<sup>1</sup>. There currently are no approved therapies for ''PCM1/JAK2''-mediated myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia; however, ''JAK2'' inhibitors have been approved for other hematopoietic neoplasms with constitutively activated ''JAK2'' kinases.<sup>2</sup>
  
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
==Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH==
 
==Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH==
Line 209: Line 221:
 
|}
 
|}
  
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
+
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote>
  
 
There are no known recurrent genomic loss/gain or LOH pattern associated with entity.
 
There are no known recurrent genomic loss/gain or LOH pattern associated with entity.
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
==Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns==
 
==Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns==
Line 236: Line 251:
 
|}
 
|}
  
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Characteristic Chromosomal Aberrations / Patterns|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
+
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Characteristic Chromosomal Aberrations / Patterns|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote>
  
 
There are no known secondary chromosomal changes and no pattern of other chromosome aberrations.   
 
There are no known secondary chromosomal changes and no pattern of other chromosome aberrations.   
  
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
==Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)==
 
==Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)==
Line 275: Line 293:
  
  
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
+
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote>
  
 
Given the rarity of the entity, there are no known recurrent aberrations. For the largest series studied, most cases were negative for mutations. However, some cases showed variants in genes associated with myeloid malignancies (ASXL1, RUNX1, SRSF2, TET2, BCOR) and one patient with B-ALL transformation showed variants in ETV6 and TP53<ref name=":2" />
 
Given the rarity of the entity, there are no known recurrent aberrations. For the largest series studied, most cases were negative for mutations. However, some cases showed variants in genes associated with myeloid malignancies (ASXL1, RUNX1, SRSF2, TET2, BCOR) and one patient with B-ALL transformation showed variants in ETV6 and TP53<ref name=":2" />
 
===Other Mutations===
 
===Other Mutations===
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
==Epigenomic Alterations==
 
==Epigenomic Alterations==
Line 304: Line 325:
 
|}
 
|}
  
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Genes and Main Pathways Involved|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
+
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Genes and Main Pathways Involved|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote>
  
 
''PCM1'' (pericentriolar material 1) is a protein present in cytoplasmic granules and can be found in association with the centrosome. ''PCM1'' is indirectly responsible for microtubule anchoring, which is necessary for a variety of cellular functions, including intracellular transport and cell division. The gene is located at band 8p22 and includes 41 exons.<sup>5</sup>
 
''PCM1'' (pericentriolar material 1) is a protein present in cytoplasmic granules and can be found in association with the centrosome. ''PCM1'' is indirectly responsible for microtubule anchoring, which is necessary for a variety of cellular functions, including intracellular transport and cell division. The gene is located at band 8p22 and includes 41 exons.<sup>5</sup>
Line 312: Line 333:
 
The PCM1-JAK2 fusion product retains the coiled-coil domains of ''PCM1'' and the activating tyrosine kinase domain of ''JAK2''. Thus PCM1-JAK2 fusion produces an aberrant tyrosine kinase that results in constitutive activation of the JAK2–STAT pathway<ref name=":1" />
 
The PCM1-JAK2 fusion product retains the coiled-coil domains of ''PCM1'' and the activating tyrosine kinase domain of ''JAK2''. Thus PCM1-JAK2 fusion produces an aberrant tyrosine kinase that results in constitutive activation of the JAK2–STAT pathway<ref name=":1" />
  
 +
<blockquote class="blockedit">
 +
<center><span style="color:Maroon">'''End of V4 Section'''</span>
 +
----
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods==
 
==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods==

Revision as of 13:27, 10 February 2025

Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)

editContent Update To WHO 5th Edition Classification Is In Process; Content Below is Based on WHO 4th Edition Classification
This page was converted to the new template on 2023-12-07. The original page can be found at HAEM4:Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with PCM1-JAK2.

(General Instructions – The main focus of these pages is the clinically significant genetic alterations in each disease type. Use HUGO-approved gene names and symbols (italicized when appropriate), HGVS-based nomenclature for variants, as well as generic names of drugs and testing platforms or assays if applicable. Please complete tables whenever possible and do not delete them (add N/A if not applicable in the table and delete the examples); to add (or move) a row or column to a table, click within the table and select the > symbol that appears to be given options. Please do not delete or alter the section headings. The use of bullet points alongside short blocks of text rather than only large paragraphs is encouraged. Additional instructions below in italicized blue text should not be included in the final page content. Please also see Author_Instructions and FAQs as well as contact your Associate Editor or Technical Support)

Primary Author(s)*

Jessica Snider, M.D. and Daynna J. Wolff, PhD

WHO Classification of Disease

Structure Disease
Book Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.)
Category Myeloid proliferations and neoplasms
Family Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms
Type Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and defining gene rearrangement
Subtype(s) Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with JAK2 rearrangement

Definition / Description of Disease

A hematologic neoplasm comprised of pluripotent (lymphoid-myeloid) stem cells characteristically seen with eosinophilia that result from the formation of a fusion between the PCM1 and JAK2 genes, leading to the expression of an aberrant tyrosine kinase. Due to its pluripotent nature, the hematologic stem cells can give rise to eosinophils, neutrophils, B-lymphoid and T-lymphoid cells. The presence of eosinophilia is not required for the diagnosis.[1][2][3]

Synonyms / Terminology

Chronic eosinophilic leukemia with PCM1/JAK2

PCM1/JAK2 –associated chronic eosinophilic leukemia

Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms associated with JAK2 rearrangement

JAK2-associated Hypereosinophilic syndrome

Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with JAK2 rearrangement

Myeloproliferative variant of the hypereosinophilic syndrome

Epidemiology / Prevalence

This disease is rare; the incidence of hypereosinophilia in general is only 0.036 per 100,000 and genetic causes represent only a small portion of these[4]There is a significant male predominance with a median age of 47 years old (age range 7-77)[1] As of August 2018, only 40 cases had been reported[5]

Clinical Features

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instruction: Can include references in the table. Do not delete table.)

Signs and Symptoms EXAMPLE: Asymptomatic (incidental finding on complete blood counts)

EXAMPLE: B-symptoms (weight loss, fever, night sweats)

EXAMPLE: Fatigue

EXAMPLE: Lymphadenopathy (uncommon)

Laboratory Findings EXAMPLE: Cytopenias

EXAMPLE: Lymphocytosis (low level)


editv4:Clinical Features
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

Patients typically present with features of a myeloproliferative disorder or MDS/MPN and most have eosinophilia and/or bone marrow fibrosis[5][6]. Patients in chronic phase tend to progress to AML quickly; some present with de novo acute leukemia, either myeloid or lymphoid[6][5] 

In general, patients with this disorder have weakness/fatigue (~26%), cough (~24%), myaligias/angioedema (~14%), rash or fever (~12%) and rhinitis (~10%)[7] ; lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly are common[5]

End of V4 Section

Sites of Involvement

Peripheral blood and bone marrow

Morphologic Features

Patients often have a hypercellular bone marrow with increased eosinophils and fibrosis[1][5].Increased granuolpoiesis with eosinophilia and neutrophil precursors, including myeloblasts[1][5]. Dyserythropoiesis and dysgranulopoiesis are not typical but may be observed[1][5] Increased lymphoblasts may also be seen with blast cells having high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios and open chromatin. If eosinophilia is present, it is comprised mainly of mature eosinophils with scattered immature forms. Eosinophilic abnormalities can be seen and include sparse granulation with small forms, vacuoles in the cytoplasm, increased eosinophil size, and nuclear hypo- and hypersegmentation.

Immunophenotype

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instruction: Can include references in the table. Do not delete table.)

Finding Marker
Positive (universal) EXAMPLE: CD1
Positive (subset) EXAMPLE: CD2
Negative (universal) EXAMPLE: CD3
Negative (subset) EXAMPLE: CD4


editv4:Immunophenotype
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

IHC can be used to characterize acute myeloid transformation and myeloblasts express dim CD45, dim CD34, dim CD117, HLA-DR, dim CD33, and dim CD13[1]. In addition, For the cases with lymphoid components, IHC can assist with assessment and show dim CD19 and dim CD10, consistent with lymphoblast lineage[1][5].

End of V4 Section

Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)

Put your text here and fill in the table

Chromosomal Rearrangement Genes in Fusion (5’ or 3’ Segments) Pathogenic Derivative Prevalence Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE: t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) EXAMPLE: 3'ABL1 / 5'BCR EXAMPLE: der(22) EXAMPLE: 20% (COSMIC)

EXAMPLE: 30% (add reference)

Yes No Yes EXAMPLE:

The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference).


editv4:Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.
Chromosomal Rearrangement Genes in Fusion (5’ or 3’ Segments) Pathogenic Derivative Prevalence
         t(8;9)(p22;p24.1) 3'JAK2 / 5'PCM1 der(8) rare
End of V4 Section


editv4:Clinical Significance (Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications).
Please incorporate this section into the relevant tables found in:
  • Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)
  • Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
  • Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns
  • Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)

Most patients present with MPN with variable degrees of eosinophilia in blood and/or bone marrow, frequent marrow fibrosis, and large aggregates of immature erythroid precursors, and clinically exhibit hepatosplenomegagly and lymphadenopathy[5]. However, diagnosis may be difficult in cases without obvious eosinophilia.

Due to the variations in presentation, the prognosis is mainly dependent on the phase at presentation, but generally tends to have an aggressive course1. There currently are no approved therapies for PCM1/JAK2-mediated myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia; however, JAK2 inhibitors have been approved for other hematopoietic neoplasms with constitutively activated JAK2 kinases.2

End of V4 Section

Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene fusions. Can include references in the table. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable. Do not delete table.)

Chr # Gain / Loss / Amp / LOH Minimal Region Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build] Minimal Region Cytoband Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE:

7

EXAMPLE: Loss EXAMPLE:

chr7:1- 159,335,973 [hg38]

EXAMPLE:

chr7

Yes Yes No EXAMPLE:

Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference).

EXAMPLE:

8

EXAMPLE: Gain EXAMPLE:

chr8:1-145,138,636 [hg38]

EXAMPLE:

chr8

No No No EXAMPLE:

Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference).

editv4:Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

There are no known recurrent genomic loss/gain or LOH pattern associated with entity.

End of V4 Section

Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns

Put your text here (EXAMPLE PATTERNS: hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis. Do not delete table.)

Chromosomal Pattern Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE:

Co-deletion of 1p and 18q

Yes No No EXAMPLE:

See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference).

editv4:Characteristic Chromosomal Aberrations / Patterns
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

There are no known secondary chromosomal changes and no pattern of other chromosome aberrations.

End of V4 Section

Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent and common as well as either disease defining and/or clinically significant. Can include references in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable. Can also refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable as well as any high impact papers or reviews of gene mutations in this entity. Do not delete table.)

Gene; Genetic Alteration Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other) Prevalence (COSMIC / TCGA / Other) Concomitant Mutations Mutually Exclusive Mutations Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE: TP53; Variable LOF mutations

EXAMPLE:

EGFR; Exon 20 mutations

EXAMPLE: BRAF; Activating mutations

EXAMPLE: TSG EXAMPLE: 20% (COSMIC)

EXAMPLE: 30% (add Reference)

EXAMPLE: IDH1 R123H EXAMPLE: EGFR amplification EXAMPLE:  Excludes hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (add reference).


Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.


editv4:Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

Given the rarity of the entity, there are no known recurrent aberrations. For the largest series studied, most cases were negative for mutations. However, some cases showed variants in genes associated with myeloid malignancies (ASXL1, RUNX1, SRSF2, TET2, BCOR) and one patient with B-ALL transformation showed variants in ETV6 and TP53[5]

Other Mutations

End of V4 Section

Epigenomic Alterations

There are no known epigenomic modifiers.

Genes and Main Pathways Involved

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Can include references in the table. Do not delete table.)

Gene; Genetic Alteration Pathway Pathophysiologic Outcome
EXAMPLE: BRAF and MAP2K1; Activating mutations EXAMPLE: MAPK signaling EXAMPLE: Increased cell growth and proliferation
EXAMPLE: CDKN2A; Inactivating mutations EXAMPLE: Cell cycle regulation EXAMPLE: Unregulated cell division
EXAMPLE:  KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations EXAMPLE:  Histone modification, chromatin remodeling EXAMPLE:  Abnormal gene expression program
editv4:Genes and Main Pathways Involved
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

PCM1 (pericentriolar material 1) is a protein present in cytoplasmic granules and can be found in association with the centrosome. PCM1 is indirectly responsible for microtubule anchoring, which is necessary for a variety of cellular functions, including intracellular transport and cell division. The gene is located at band 8p22 and includes 41 exons.5

JAK2 (janus kinase 2) is a tyrosine kinase responsible for activation of the JAK-STAT pathway by mediating tyrosine phosphorylation, leading to cell proliferation and differentiation. Constitutive activation of JAK2 can result from chromosomal translocations and lead to uncontrolled proliferation of hematopoietic cells. The gene is located at band 9p24.1 and includes 25 exons.6

The PCM1-JAK2 fusion product retains the coiled-coil domains of PCM1 and the activating tyrosine kinase domain of JAK2. Thus PCM1-JAK2 fusion produces an aberrant tyrosine kinase that results in constitutive activation of the JAK2–STAT pathway[6]

End of V4 Section

Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods

Diagnosis of this entity is made when a chromosome analysis showing a t(8;9) correlates with the clinical and morphological phenotype of the patient and/or when the fusion is confirmed by ancillary testing. FISH with a dual color, dual fusion probe for PCM1-JAK2 and sequencing of RNA to detect the functional fusion are the most commonly used methods to confirm this diagnosis. FISH with a JAK2 break-apart probe may also provide useful information to confirm a diagnosis.

However, because the clinical presentation can vary and this disease can show many overlapping morphological features of other entities, the PCM1-JAK2 fusion or 8;9 translocation may be detected without overt suspicion. Therefore, agnostic genomic methods such as large panels of RNA fusions known to be associated with myeloid or lymphoid malignancies, whole exome/genome sequencing and occasionally chromosomal microarray analysis may provide evidence for this diagnosis.

Familial Forms

No familial forms have been documented.

Additional Information

Links

HAEM4:Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia and Rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1, or with PCM1-JAK2

PCM1

JAK2

References

(use the "Cite" icon at the top of the page) (Instructions: Add each reference into the text above by clicking on where you want to insert the reference, selecting the “Cite” icon at the top of the page, and using the “Automatic” tab option to search such as by PMID to select the reference to insert. The reference list in this section will be automatically generated and sorted. If a PMID is not available, such as for a book, please use the “Cite” icon, select “Manual” and then “Basic Form”, and include the entire reference.)

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Bain BJ, Horny HP, Arber DA, et al. Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1, or with PCM1-JAK2., in World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th edition. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Arber DA, Hasserjian RP, Le Beau MM, Orazi A, and Siebert R, Editors. IARC Press: Lyon, France, p129-171.
  2. Reiter, Andreas; et al. (2017). "Myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia". Blood. 129 (6): 704–714. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-10-695973. ISSN 0006-4971.
  3. Baer, Constance; et al. (2018). "Molecular genetic characterization of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms associated with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1 or PCM1-JAK2". Haematologica. 103 (8): e348–e350. doi:10.3324/haematol.2017.187302. ISSN 0390-6078. PMC 6068021. PMID 29567772.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  4. Crane, Martin M.; et al. (2010). "Incidence of myeloproliferative hypereosinophilic syndrome in the United States and an estimate of all hypereosinophilic syndrome incidence". Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 126 (1): 179–181. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.03.035. PMC 5781228. PMID 20639012.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  5. Jump up to: 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 Tang, Guilin; et al. (2019). "Hematopoietic neoplasms with 9p24/JAK2 rearrangement: a multicenter study". Modern Pathology. 32 (4): 490–498. doi:10.1038/s41379-018-0165-9. ISSN 0893-3952.
  6. Jump up to: 6.0 6.1 6.2 Hoeller, Sylvia; et al. (2011). "PCM1–JAK2-fusion: a potential treatment target in myelodysplastic–myeloproliferative and other hemato-lymphoid neoplasms". Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets. 15 (1): 53–62. doi:10.1517/14728222.2011.538683. ISSN 1472-8222.
  7. Gotlib, Jason (2017). "World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management". American Journal of Hematology. 92 (11): 1243–1259. doi:10.1002/ajh.24880.

Notes

*Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page.  If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the CCGA coordinators (contact information provided on the homepage).  Additional global feedback or concerns are also welcome. *Citation of this Page: “Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with JAK2 rearrangement”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated 02/10/2025, https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:Myeloid/lymphoid_neoplasm_with_JAK2_rearrangement.